The very fancy mathematical proof. But for many centuries extremely pantry cabinet anxious because

I f there was a lot of godly devotion but now there are so many cult science. Those who worship science cocky for his often wiser, more knowledgeable. But if you look at the fact you will find some people go to church or temples remain very crowded, which lots of people are doing science. Why is that?
Simply because science is not enough pantry cabinet to answer a lot of practical questions posed by life. Even science will never be able to answer those questions. There is a world OUTSIDE OF SCIENCE abundant that people only have access to it by way of feeling or contemplation, rather than proven by the scientific method, logic or evidence.
That is why from the 17th century, Blaise Pascal pantry cabinet wrote in the book "Pensées" (Meditations) of his, that "physical science was not comforted when I sorrow pantry cabinet for the ignorance of morality, but the understanding of morality always comforted me because ignorance of the physical sciences. "
Only one question was enough to see the man's profound philosopher Pascal was ahead of his time several centuries, because he seems to suggest us to "count vanity / vanity of science" (the vanity of sciences) [1], if the science was not complemented by the external knowledge it - the external knowledge essential for all cognitive system, if the system wants to become more complete. It is the sense of incompleteness theorem of Kurt Gödel, Pascal was born after three centuries.
To clarify the above comments, please introduce readers with article 2 of two American scientists: "H diet of science" (The Limitations of Science) by Lynn Fancher and "Gödel's incompleteness pantry cabinet theorem : 1 Mathematical Breakthrough of the 20th century "(Gödel's pantry cabinet incompleteness: The # 1 Mathematical Breakthrough of the 20th Century) by Perry Marshall.
To discover the secrets of the universe, human beings do not have a better tool than a science. However, there are several types of questions can not be answered by science. In other words, science has limitations.
There are three main areas of science can not help us to answer. All three areas have a common pantry cabinet characteristic: The question arises that can not find the answer can be verified. The verification pantry cabinet plays an essential role in science, pantry cabinet so the question is simply beyond the scope of science. Lynn Fancher, Professor of Biology at University College DuPage, pantry cabinet Glen Ellyn, pantry cabinet Illinois, USA The paper's author, "The Limitations of Science".
Science can not answer the question of value. For example, can not answer the question "how beautiful flower among flowers?", pantry cabinet Or "gold and steel, which worth more?". Our culture is considered more valuable than gold, but when you need a metal to build a skyscraper, the gold has become extremely detrimental, because it is too soft.
Science pantry cabinet can not answer the question of ethics. The problem to decide whether something is good or bad, right or wrong, pantry cabinet is beyond the scope of science. That is why the scientific evidence pantry cabinet can never help us resolve the debate about abortion: Everything that a scientist can tell us what the problem is What happens when a developing fetus; The issue of abortion is right or wrong is determined by the cultural institutions and society - in other words, by morality. Here science will not help (Note that I did not say the scientists are exempt pantry cabinet from consideration ethical issues surrounding pantry cabinet their work. Like everyone else, the researchers also examined ethical considerations around what they do).
Finally, the science does not help us answer the questions related pantry cabinet to the concept of super-self-nature (supernatural). The prefix "super" (super) means "above" (above). So "super-self-nature" pantry cabinet means "above" (or exceed) the natural. Baggage of a scientist only include the natural law; questions ultra-self-nature is beyond the scope of science. Many scientists often forget the limits of science every few years so that some scientists published a book saying that they have to prove the existence of God, or vice versa, to prove that God does not to exist. This is impossible because God is self-super-natural. So if someone made "scientific evidence" to prove their point about the super-self-course is just a little thought will show that they have gone right out the limits of science. 2 * Gödel's incompleteness theorem: 1 Mathematical Breakthrough of the twentieth century:
The very fancy mathematical proof. But for many centuries extremely pantry cabinet anxious because they have many things they see is true but can not prove. But in the early years of the decade in 1900, a wave of optimism swept into the world of mathematics. The best mathematicians of the time like David Hilbert, Bertrand Russell, Alfred Whitehead, ... believe that they are rapidly nearing a waterbody